Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Ferreting about over the last few years since I bought it, I suspect the FG5 starts life in China and, in the early stages of fabrication, is on the same line as the FG3. Then at some point it's plucked off the FG3 line, shipped to Japan and finished off at Hamamatsu and marketed from there as the FG5. Meanwhile the FG3 stays in China and is finished off by the Chinese. The difference in price reflects the greater total production costs of the FG5 and a better overall finishing off and setup. But the FG3 and the FG5 look identical.
As you probably know, the modern 'Red Label' Yamahas (F, G or S, X or not, 3 or 5) seek to replicate some of the features of the well regarded earlier FG's with Red Labels which carry some premium on the second hand market. FG's from the 1960's and 70's which are 'Nippon Gakki' (implying Japanese manufacture) basically. The modern Red Labels have a good rep. My FG5 would be my every time go to guitar were it not for the fact that, at 67, I now also like to play something a bit smaller. Better on the old posture, especially the old shoulder! I can sit and play for longer in comfort with an OM or OO.
The FG3 is an excellent instrument. I played one when I bought my FG5 from Yamaha London in 2019. A new one will need a setup but then so did the FG5 initially. They're both nice light dynamic instruments with a good mid range which is where some cheaper dreadnoughts can disappoint. The trebles on both were lovely. Not sure I went for the FG5 tbh. Marketing probably!