Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
There's nothing wrong with short 1/4 or 1/2 bends with a quick release on an acoustic, acoustic blues is full of them.
You certainly don't hang on a bend on an acoustic though. It sounds s**t.
Acoustic you can whip out the case or off the stand and start strumming. Also essential to build good chord and rhythm knowledge with the pure sound of the guitar. But usually I match the type of guitar to their music tastes. The pop folk Ed Sheeran type fans are obviously going to want to play on acoustic. The rock band AC/DC or Arctic Monkeys fans are going to want to play electric.
Play as many types of guitar & styles as you can. I wish I'd done more country & fingerstyle years ago.
Can't hide when playing acoustic. Just one man and his guitar - I prefer it TBH.
Get singing lessons then you're a one man band and can write SONGS.
I don't regret learning electric. The theory all ties in, anyway.
You learn a lot about construction and care with acoustics - they are more difficult / delicate.
Try using a thumb pick with acoustic as it forces correct thumb movements.
It is immensely more satisfying to play full songs & sing on an acoustic than it is to widdle on your own with no band (bands take time, money, energy etc)
My YouTube Channel
You probably need a greater intrinsic strength in the muscles of the hand and forearm for an acoustic because the action is higher, but you soon get used to it really. It's just practice and physiological adjustment.
If you believe Martin, the answer is the SC-13e/etc range. Haven't tried one yet.
My YouTube Channel
My YouTube Channel
However, don't be afraid to use lighter strings - although there's a lot of snobbery about it (possibly even worse than for electric guitars!) anything lighter than suspension bridge cables will not ruin the tone of your guitar . The lightest gauge for acoustics is usually 10s, and if you want to try those it's worth having the set-up checked since acoustics usually come from the factory strung with 12s, and going to 10s can allow the neck to straighten and the bridge to sink a bit, which can make the action too low and *that* can kill the tone. But it's not the light strings or the 'lack of tension' themselves.
Especially if you're only just starting to play acoustic, it's worth helping yourself by using lighter strings - not necessarily 10s, 11s are a good compromise that will most likely need less set-up adjustment. I still use 11s on my guitars and they sound perfectly good to me. I don't have the action that low. Also make sure the nut is cut correctly, that makes a big difference with heavier strings, because it affects the force needed to bend them down to the frets more than with lighter strings - that makes a *big* difference to the feel in the open chord positions.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
Don't know about others, but there's stuff you do on acoustic that doesn't sound as good on electric, & vice-versa. (Actually, for me, nothing I do sounds good on electric. Plus there's the farting around with plugs & leads instead of picking up an acoustic where you're ready to go).
Yes acoustic- depending on how you look at it- can be harder. But there's a lot of electric playing which is difficult in a different way.
Hand someone who's only ever played an electric strung with 9s (like me for the first ages after I started playing!) an acoustic strung with 12s and they'll look a bit silly.
Hand someone an electric strung with 9s plugged into a 5150 lead channel who's only ever played an acoustic strung with 12s and I'm not sure they're going to look any less silly.
In what way ?
I find it fantastic for building hand strength - when I go on to electric this aids me in nailing intonation on bends...not to mention clean fretting / picking technique for fast runs... It certainly hasn't done Al Di Meola or John McLaughlin any harm. Check out Friday Night In San Francisco.
I would never use the same strumming / rhythm technique on electric and acoustic - if you do that it's gonna sound off. You obviously adjust according to the circumstances.
On an electric, not so much. It's waaay faster and you can move on sooner.
Yes, we have the physical differences, already well outlined in posts above. Electric requires a very delicate touch, a heap of control, and several extra techniques not used much or at all on acoustic. Acoustic requires more muscle and more skill to get good tone. But these physical differences are the least of it.
The main difference is that, for the most part, electric guitar is played in a band with, at very least, bass and drums but more typically keys, horns, and/or a second, sometimes even a third guitar. Acoustic guitar is far more often a solo instrument. You do see a lot of acoustics played as (e.g.) second or third guitar in a band to fill out the sound, but nobody much aspires to that role, pays it a lot of attention, or takes it very seriously. It's just a job handed to the least-skilled guitarist in the band, sometimes to fill the sound out, sometimes because at least it looks better on stage than dancing and playing maracas. "Serious" acoustic guitar tends to be solo, solo with vocals and/or harmonica, or in a small ensemble where all of your notes are prominent in the mix. (Compare with "fill-in" acoustic where you are mostly strumming some chords for the singer and the electric lead player to solo over.)
This is where acoustic players really have to work their arses off: you've got no bass player to hold down the bottom end, no drummer to keep things moving, no other instruments to hide behind, and no chance of a bit of a break during the song while some other player takes the spotlight and you do something easy. It's just you and your guitar.
Serious electric players don't have any of those difficulties to hurdle (though in a 3-piece where they are the only melodic instrument the situation is a bit similar). On the other hand, as an acoustic player I don't have to learn how to do three-semitone bends getting the pitch right every time, or how to use a whammy bar, or how to set an amp and pedal chain up. And I don't have to learn how to put up with drummers!
Different instruments. I'd argue that classical/nylon is a different instrument again, though the case for that is less clear cut.
* First, I don't dislike electric guitar when some other person plays it. It's a truly wonderful instrument and it didn't get to dominate popular music for more than half a century by accident. I only dislike it when I play it.
* Hand me an acoustic and I can play a bit. We all like what we are good at.
* I suck at electric. I have a heavy right hand and no clue how to damp strings the way an electric mostly needs. I could overcome those things with a bit of practice, of course, but never have (for the reasons below).
* I suck at amps and pedals. With an acoustic, the sound it makes is the sound it makes. It's up to me to use my brain and my fingers to get it to sound the way I want. There is a limited sound palette and I can explore it at will. With electric sounds, even with just one amp (never mind pedals) there is a huge range of sounds to chose from, many of them rather bad, some of them very good. There are hundreds of choices to make just using pickup selection, gain, and volume - and that's without touching the tone and volume controls on the actual guitar. And then you add pedals as well. And reverb. I get lost. Seriously! I fiddle about a bit and before very long I have no idea whether I'm getting a good sound or a bad sound and I give up. (Compare with bass: back in the day when I played for a few years, I knew what sound I liked and simply adjusted things until I had what I wanted.)
* I hate the way that the number of stings you use changes the electric sound. With an acoustic, if you hit one string a certain way, it sounds just so. Hit two strings that same way and they both sound just so, Or six strings. To control the sound, you control the force with which you strike the strings. On electric, in contrast, you set the amp to get exactly the sound you want playing one string a certain way, but then you do that with two or three strings for a different part of the song and all of a sudden the amp is distorting all over the place. Electric guitar is so inconsistent! It does my head in. Anyone who says it is "easier to play" is dreaming. There is a whole different set of skills to learn.
* Electric guitar is a band instrument. I like playing by myself.
* Acoustic guitar can be played anywhere and anytime. All you need is the guitar. (If you play fingerstyle you don't even need to find a pick. You just pick it up and start playing.) You don't need to faff about with chords and cables and batteries and power points and pedals and amplifiers, you just play. If I want to go and sit in the garden because it is a nice day, that's what I do. If Mrs Tannin is watching something or listening to something, I simply go to another room, or step outside. Doing that with electric is impractical. (Sure, I could use headphones but I don't like them much. I like being in the room.)
* I can play an acoustic guitar when Mrs Tannin is in the room. Electric, I'd have to go to a different room. (a) We don't really have a room to spare. (b) We like being together in the same room.
* Electric guitar mostly falls into two categories, rhythm and lead. Far and away the majority of the repertoire has a repetitive rhythm part which is boring to play, and a "creative" lead part which is challenging and interesting in its way, but tied to the same-old, same-old changes. Yes, there are bands who craft their songs such that nothing repeats and all the players have real parts which grow and develop as the songs progresses, but this is very rare. It also takes a major commitment from each player and a hell of a lot of time in the practice room. Playing solo acoustic, you are your own bass player and your own rhythm player. There is nothing at all to stop you making the the different parts of the song (bass, rhythm, lead) as interesting as your imagination and your technique allow. There is no straightjacket.
* I love wood. Acoustic guitars are (mostly) made of wood, and the exact choice of wood makes a huge difference to the sound. Electric guitars are often made of wood too, but seldom if ever does the wood make any real contribution to the sound. It is merely decorative (if even that). In acoustics, there is a vast range of timbers and combinations and body shapes and styles, all showcasing the particular woods in different ways. If you love wood, acoustic is for you.
Strings I've mainly used 11s on electric and 12s on acoustic so not much difference.
Most of the acoustic playing I have been exposed to is traditional Scottish/Irish stuff where they bash away at chords along with fiddle, singer, or whatever.
And I play on my own and definitely prefer electric.