Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
sometimes the difference ISNT just body size but the fret join of the neck/body and/or body depth.
ALSO smaller guitar doesnt necessarily equate to less ££, sometimes quite the opposite - "good value" 000 and smaller are harder to find
Im slightly surprised you find an OM too big (which ones have you played - if only for reference) as OM's are far more "easy" to find than 000 and certainly 00
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
All that said, I think we need to be clearer on what it is that you are looking for. "Concert", "OM", "000" ... these terms (and a dozen others) get used by different people to mean different things. As Bertie says, there is also the body depth factor, plus the location of the bridge (which is a function of the placement of the neck-body join). Oh, and scale length, of course.
Tell us more about your problems with the lower bout of the Sigma. Do you think it is the depth? The width? Or the location of the bridge?
they are really easy/comfortable players and you might find it "Ok"
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.