Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
His writing style is basic, he admitted this himself. There is no flowery language or clever literary tricks. He just tells a story, and the stories are usually pretty good. Sometimes this is all I want from a book.
I think the stuff he wrote in the late 80's has dated much worse than the stuff he wrote in the 50's.
Instagram
I actually ended up finding a lot of the made up parts the most enjoyable - but I get that a hardcore Asimov fan who’d read the books much more recently might find it jarring
(Usually, screen adaptations leave 80% of the book out, partly stuff that doesn't work well in a visual medium but mostly just because books generally have far more in them than can possibly be squeezed into a film production. The curious thing here is that the producers feel constrained to put lots of extra stuff in just to make it work.)
I remember the books feeling very very slow but otherwise nothing.
Enjoyed the TV adaptation however.
I love the books, and the rest of Asimov's works, but my first couple of attempts with the show left me feeling completely disinterested. I'm not sure what changed this morning though!