Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
I’m no expert but I like the old smaller body carved top Gibsons, L-30 L-37 etc. Gibsons other brand stuff generally had pressed tops which differ in tone a surprising amount
I also like the modern Epiphone Masterbilt series. Especially the round-hole, it reminds me of the old Kay Deluxe which almost sounds banjo-like. I have a particular bent towards county blues which these guitars are more suited to These guitars differ greatly from big and/or higher end jazz guitars which I know little about.
Theres bracing to consider. Parallel vs X.
Truthfully, I don’t know how I’d take to a gritty-middly sound versus a fuller response - content to try reasonable examples of either - in situations like this I’m always drawn to used so that I can afford to experiment and chop it if it’s not enjoyable
Feedback
Yet again I rue being in a town with no meaningful trying-interesting-guitars options
Feedback
Feedback
(1) the cheaper ones can sound good but not if you try and string and strum them like just another guitar
(2) Their tops need to be driven, so heavier strings, if its just for acoustic some bronze content works well ( altho not so goodthrough a pickup )
(3) if you use a pick, try a thicker one with a rounded edge. Thin picks make all archtops sound tinny.
(4) Parallel bracing tends to produce a middly , bluesier tone. In my experience x bracing is ‘sweeter’
The good acoustic ones really are things of visual and aural beauty, but the market is v. small so resale is hard work
Only opinions though