Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
I’m mainly an electric player with a preference for light strings but have taken an interest in fingerpicking in the last few years after seeing Tommy Emmanuel live and being inspired by his compositions. It really is a whole other world but I even finally got a Dunlop thumb pick to try rather than only using hybrid picking or just my thumb and fingers.
I picked up a second hand 2011 Ibanez EP10 a few years back for about half the new price as I liked the thin more comfortable body and whilst it has some wear and tear and was obviously primarily designed to be plugged in it actually sounds pretty good acoustically to me and over time has improved.
I also have an old Korean made Ovation 12–string having tried and sold on cheap dreadnought types that I just found too uncomfortable and difficult to play for any length of time. With light strings (an 8 for the high g) the Ovation is more or less manageable.
I’ve been interested in trying a more traditional acoustic and whilst nowhere local seems to actually stock the models that sounded most appealing (whenever I get interested in a guitar this is usually the case so mostly I end up buying mail order and hoping for the best for this reason).
I initially wanted to try a Martin 000-15m because of the great feedback and reviews but the narrower nut made me change my mind on that. I did at last get to try a few low end Martins - a 00X2E and a 000-10E. The bodies were of course deeper than my Ibanez but not uncomfortable. I didn’t however think the 00X2E sounded any better than my Ibanez. The 000-10E had a much richer sound and a lot of volume. This seems a good deal for the money and whilst I can’t justify the higher end standard USA models (000-18 up) I do currently have the budget for more basic USA made one which takes me to the 000-17 Whiskey Sunset or at a push the more recent Streetmaster 000-16.
The 17 aesthetically looks better to me and is a good amount cheaper but in theory the streetmaster is higher spec. The look I could get used to I imagine - I have seen a photo where a pick guard was added and it helped make it look less severe.
Anyone have experience of these two or I’m I better either just getting the 000-10e or saving for a higher end model?
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
I am less convinced by the 15 and 16 series Martins. For the same money you can have any of a wide range of models from many different makers of quality: Furch, Taylor, Maton, made-in-Japan Takamine, and I understand from people here that Dowina are doing good stuff too. For the price of a 16-series Martin you should be able to buy instruments from any of those just-mentioned makers equal in quality to a Standard Series Martin.
If you want the short scale as well as the small(ish) body, that gets a bit more difficult. Martin may well be your best bet. (Takamine Japan make some lovely small instruments they call "New Yorkers" but nearly always with those horribly narrow 42.5mm nuts. What a shame - I'd have bought one long since otherwise.)
My YouTube Channel
There are others but those are ones I remember off the top of my head.
Martin 000-18 Modern Deluxe | guitarguitar
or Larrivee OOO40 for £1,849?
Larrivee 000-40 Mahogany Legacy Series - Guitar.co.uk
Martins are not the only beautifully made OOO's - just amongst the most expensive!! Other makes are parking on Martin's lawn now because of overpricing
Ideally I was hoping to keep it under 2k and closer to 1.5 would be better still. A 14 fret neck joint this time - I hear there is a sweeter tone advantage with 12 but just loosing the cutaway will seem odd when I have full access now and 24 frets. Maybe I can add a 12 later
Looking at the specs of my EP10 it says it is an Englemann Spruce top with mahogany back and sides, x-bracing and a mahogany neck. That is the sound I am familiar with I guess so I’m not sure how Adirondack and rosewood compare?
I can only say that Sepele for everything in that 000-10e was very different and not in a bad way.
Other brands certainly do offer better deals and I do keep hearing good things. It would be easier if I know what sound I wanted for sure. I’m mainly trying to learn the easier TE stuff and some of the finger style arrangements of songs in books.
Sapele is broadly similar to mahogany. Although a different genus it is in the same family. It is a little heavier and quite a bit harder. (It might be useful to consider its weight compared to other common tonewoods. The raw figures are meaningless without context but in relative terms Sapele has 81% of Indian Rosewood's density. Khaya ("African mahogany") has 77%, and Honduran Mahogany (aka "genuine mahogany") 71%.)
Back to the main question, what makes Adirondack spruce (more correctly known as Red Spruce) and rosewood different to Englemann and mahogany?
Red Spruce is the hardest and often stiffest of the common topwood timbers (Western Red Cedar, Sitka, European, Red, and Englemann Spruce) but isn't much heavier. It is more difficult to excite (because it is stiff it doesn't want to start vibrating) but once it does start to move it is loud and clear with a particularly crisp note. This makes it prized among bluegrass players (who need volume to keep up with banjos) and anyone looking for maximum volume. It can also have a lovely clear, bell-like tone. On the other hand, it can be very difficult to play softly or with good dynamics (it tends to be a bit all or nothing) and that crisp tone can get a bit wearing.
Rosewood - these days it is usually Indian Rosewood - is the hardest and heaviest of the commonly used back and sides woods. It tends to produce a rich bass and a very rich top end with not a lot of middle. Rosewood guitars usually have a rich, plummy sound, bell-like or glassy at the top end, and often with a big bass underneath. It's a great sound and rosewood is the single most popular back wood for good reason. But it too has drawbacks. Like Red Spruce, it can be a bit too much of a good thing. That lush rosewood sound gets a bit same-old, same-old (you hear it everywhere) and it can be cloying, like a cake with too much sugar - it tastes great for the first bite but you soon get sick of it.
(FWIW, of my seven guitars, one uses Indian Rosewood; I play it regularly and like it a lot but have no plans to add another one. One is enough. Another one of my seven has a Red Spruce top and I struggle with it. It has a great sound at its best but is difficult to control. It is very good for loud country-style picking (bluegrass and similar) if you do it just so, and can be excellent for blues fingerpicking, but playing any other style on it and sounding good requires unrelenting concentration. Yes, I can do that (sort of) but what is the point when I can get an even better sound much more easily (and enjoyably!) on any of the other guitars? I plan to sell that one, but reluctantly. What it does well it does brilliantly.)
Englemann Spruce is the lightest and second-softest of the common spruces - it is barely any heavier than Western Red Cedar. It has a gentle subtlety to it and doesn't like being worked too hard. If you play softly or with medium weight, Englemann can be a great choice but thrash it and it sulks. Red Spruce is the opposite!
TLDR: very different timbers! Hard to get two pairings more different.
DISCLAIMER: for all my yammer-yammer about timbers, a competent guitar maker can use (almost) any timbers to get (almost) any result. The paragraphs above are about what you can usually expect, all else being equal. Actual individual guitars you can pick up in a shop mostly more-or-less follow the expectations above but that's a "mostly", not an "always". In short, you have to try them for yourself.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZzzOzucVLM
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.