UNPLANNED DOWNTIME: 12th Oct 23:45
What's Hot
I'm sure this subject will have been done to death here, but anyway... I'm in London for the weekend so I thought I'd pay Hank's in Denmark Street a visit to try the Terry Packs they've got in stock as they seem to be good value. I tried two OMRCs and two SJRSs. They were all really easy to play but I've got no idea how they sound as the strings were ancient. The SJRSs date from 2016 and 2017 and the strings are almost certainly the originals.
I tried maybe 10 or a dozen other guitars in the 2-5K range, mostly Martins but also Taylors, Guilds and a Lowden S35, expecting to be blown away by at least some of them but it was the same story with just about all of them, old, dead strings. There wasn't a guitar I played today that I'd have taken over my £900 Furch Blue OM-CM. I don't know how these places ever sell a guitar when just about their entire stock sounds dead and muffled. I can't believe they don't have a rolling program of string replacement. Maybe the rely on online sales.
0 LOL 1 Wow! 0 Wisdom · Share on Twitter
Comments
Those dead strings could make them a bargain seeing that no-one else is going to be interested! You have to feel confident of your ability to estimate the true sound of a guitar from the way it sounds with crook strings though. The one time I bought a guitar with crook strings (my Guild, which was second-hand and had strings out of Jurassic Park) I decided that it was going to sound OK. But once the shopkeeper realised that I was genuinely interested in it, he offered to restring it on the spot. $12 for a set of D'Addarios to seal a $1500 sale has to be worthwhile for him.
But i can understand why the strings were dead. Lord alone knows how many people had played those guitars, not all with clean hands!
I tried a Martin OO18 £3k and didn't hold a candle to my £600 Larrivee. So I hear you...
My YouTube Channel
A guitar with fresh strings is going to sound better than a guitar with dead ones, so a better chance of selling.
I went to Mak's today and it couldn't have been more different. I tried a Bourgeois OM Vintage, a McNally OM21 and I think an Atkin Essential OM. All had fresh strings and sounded great. The Atkin was a little unresponsive relative to the others but I would have had a hard time choosing between the other two. Tonally probably the Bourgeois but the McNally was incredibly responsive, took very little effort to make it sing. At 3 grand I need to do a bit of saving though!
Tricky, innit!
The majority are set up a little on the high side. This is because it is very easy to lower the action to a customer's liking but (on an acoustic) difficult to raise it.
Some makes ship with the action set lower, Taylor is an example. My assumption is that Taylor do this because their quality control is so very good - every guitar leaves the factory set exactly on-spec and they don't have to leave as much margin for error. They also have the advantage of using an easily-adjustable modern bolt-on neck design which can be shimmed to a precise angle. Many other companies still use a non-adjustable dovetail which is difficult and time-consuming to set just so. For this reason, they need to start higher, leaving it to the buyer to adjust the saddle as needed.
I usually set mine up for roughly 2.0mm at the 12th fret (bass) and 1.5mm (treble). However I set my newest one up for 2.5 and 2.0mm because that seemed to suit its big, bold nature. It has the richest, deepest sound of any of them. Is that because I have the action that little bit higher? Or just because its the best guitar?
When I was looking for a nice hog dread with a 1 11/16 nut, the Atkin Essential D was top of my list to try having owned a lovely D37 before. They get factory-strung with Elixirs which to my ears produce a right jangly mess of unflattering overtones. I tried two examples in two different shops and couldn't bring myself to buy one in the hope that it would sound good to me with non-coated strings. Neither shop were prepared to restring it with normal PB strings even when I offered to pay for a new set, plus a set of Elixirs to be put back on if I didn't take the guitar.
A good compromise would be treated strings - my Guild and Eastman both came with D'Addario EXP (now XT I think) and sound great with them.
Maybe they just thought I wasn't serious from the standard of my guitar playing! For some reason I always clam up in guitar shops and struggle to play anything well.
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
Both in the Midlands; I don't really want to name and shame as I've bought guitars (not strung with Elixirs) from both places before and have been happy with the service.
"I don't know why people buy online, don't they know all the added value they get from buying in our bricks and mortar shop?"
"What does that entail?"
"Well, nothing really. We just keep saying it and keep haemorrhaging sales to the online box shifters for inexplicable reasons..."
(I think my Dowina came with those EXP strings... I agree, they're pretty nice and if they last longer too...
I'd also be too scared to ask for a restring like that... probably because I'd just assume they'd say no. Considering some of the shops I've been in (not all!) seemed to think that asking them to get a guitar down off the wall for you to try was akin to asking them for a kidney, I'm not sure my assumption was necessarily wrong...)
Even worse, I forget. I don't mean I forget how to play guitar, I mean I forget what songs I can play! It's like when someone asks me what bands I like... I struggle to think of more than about one band!
Yeah I was going to post something similar!