Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
I think the big difference for you would be the low, very playable action of a flamenco guitar when compared with the usually high action and improved clarity and sustain of a proper classical guitar. From the sort of use you describe, I would go for the most comfortable, easy-playing option, which in my humble opinion would be a guitar designed for flamenco.
Good luck with the world of nylon, but be warned - it's ever so addictive ...
Keith
I was amazed when I picked up the guitar I mention above. I thought it would be rubbish but I found myself playing some interesting things and I have some passable, if a bit rudimentary, right hand technique which I've not employed before. It is, however, a stop-gap. It has two different sets of tuners and a couple are hard to get to pitch.
Again, this is complete guesswork, but my thought is that actual classical guitars (as opposed to very cheap student guitars labelled "classical" because they have nylon strings) will cost as much or more than flamenco ones.
My recent experience with a steel-strung acoustic is that Yamaha are quite good at any price point, so that drew me to one of their classical models. Then I read a bit further and saw that, as @Sputnik points out, flamencos have some characteristics that make them a bit more playable for my sort of style.
That said, I am one of those people who just picks up a guitar if there is one lying around and sees what happens. I would just play the cheapo one I am using at the moment if I was able to get it to stay reliably in tune, but I suspect it would need to go to a tech for new tuners, nut etc and not be worth the cost and bother.
I am not able to tell the difference between the types, but Jonathan Richman has said he plays a flamenco type, hence me looking into those.
As you say, trying is probably the way forward here.
He used to play a jazzmaster in the 70s...
I get that it can be returned if ordered online but it's not ideal and I've never done it that way. Some have to, though.
That Yamaha C40 looks OK to me and is likely to be about as much as I can afford at the moment. I mentioned Jonathan Richman earlier and he made comment along the lines of the guitar he plays at the moment is something that he bought and likes (rather than having sought out something supposedly authentic and built to specific standards) - I think that is the right way to go about it.
I think trying one will be a good idea. I had my heart set on a specific steel acoustic last year. When I went in to PMT to try it, it was awful. I ended up with a Yamaha which, to me, was better than more expensive ones I tried.