Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
https://www.projectmusic.net/eastman-e6om-tc-guitar-with-thermo-cured-top-and-case-27385-p.asp?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIko6p4qSK-QIVA-ztCh2TJwwvEAQYAiABEgLnc_D_BwE
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
what budget you looking at, and are you looking for OM/000 size ?
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
Looking for an all-rounder, preferably.
Yamaha FS Series Acoustic Guitars | Yamaha Music London
Yamaha FG Series Acoustic Guitars | Yamaha Music London
Eastman is a Chinese brand and some have concerns about their employment ethics and wood sourcing. Most Yamahas (a massive Japanese conglomerate) at the cheaper end also originate from China too though so maybe plus c'est la même chose! I would like to think that the products of Japanese industry are more ethical, but that might not be a given.
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
I couldn't possibly comment as to which is which.
I know the problem. Glad to be of service
Yamaha has a good reputation for sustainable and ethical practices. See here: https://www.yamaha.com/en/csr/environment/sustainable_resource_use/ Not perfect, but pretty good, and improving year by year. And their instruments, of course, are among the very best - and that statement holds good whether you are shopping in the £200 price range or at the £4000 end. Come to think of it, it holds good whether you are looking for a guitar or a flute or even a piano.
For me Taylor's efforts to utilise sustainable wood and protect nature are a gold standard in the industry. Plus, with Lowden, they are enthusiastic about experimentation with some of the (what must in reality be scores of) woods suitable for use as tone woods and structural woods. Other makers are too ready to give players what they expect. Rosewood, spruce, mahogany etc. Makers of guitars have always been influenced by customer demand. It takes bravery and vision to actually create that demand. Lowden's support of the use of walnut is a good example of that. Australia's use of Bunya another.
So far as the industry giants go, Taylor is the leader, with honourable mention also to Furch. (Does Furch count as an "industry giant"? They certainly make a lot of guitars. The Godin empire in Canada also seems to be doing the right thing on a large scale.
Here in Oz Cole Clark is outstanding, with the vast bulk of their production from sustainable timbers, and a commitment to phasing out all non-sustainable timbers as they deplete their existing stock of (e.g.) Indian Rosewood. Maton (a larger manufacturer than CC, about the same size as Lowden) pioneered local timbers back in the 1950s - largely at first because it was difficult to source imported timber in the post-war economy with rationing and foreign exchange shortages and so on, but over time that morphed into an appreciation of the merits of local timber for its own sake, and better understandings of the best way to work it. These days, 90-95% of Maton's production uses Blackwood or Queensland Maple, typically with spruce tops but sometimes Bunya or Blackwood. Outside of a few small-shop luthiers (and not many even of those) there isn't a maker in this country still using rosewood and mahogany as their mainline timbers, it's all about the locally-grown stuff, which is in almost all cases sustainable.
Back in the US, Breedlove is a funny one. Breedlove were gung-ho on sustainability and pioneered Myrtlewood. They are still talking the talk but their Chinese partnership program makes me wonder. Any company which produces a dedicated "eco" model of anything - guitar, car, T-shirt, you name it - has to be suspect. It is nearly always an admission that the company as a whole is doing the wrong thing but this particular range (typically at extra cost) is sustainable / palm-oil free / carbon neutral / fair trade / other selling point. Gibson, for example - a known offender with form - has an "eco" range, and says as little as possible about their mainline production. Well, maybe Breedlove are just not communicating effectively, but when I see a whole uncertified range of standard products, plus one little range of "eco" ones, I habitually smell a rat.