Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
If you can comfortably play a dread, why go smaller?
But the reality is that you can play blues on anything. Seriously - any guitar makes a good blues guitar, and any good guitar makes a great blues guitar. I mostly play my bluesy stuff on one of my "blues guitars" (the Guild, the Mineur, or sometimes the Cole Clark Angel) but every now and then I happen to play blues-flavoured things on the theoretically unsuitable Messiah - a classic sweet-voiced spruce and rosewood guitar, rich and plummy-voiced a bit like a Taylor. And what happens? It sounds great. Sometimes I play blues-flavoured stuff on my gigantic Tacoma baritone. That works great too. If I had a ukulele that would sound ....well, it would sound like crap. There are limits. But in general, they all work.
Personally Id go smaller, or at least give it a go - a good / well built "slightly" smaller guitar (OM) you wont notice much loss of tone, but will have different dynamics - you may find it more comfortable, you might not.
Drop down further to 00 / parlor and with shorter scales and 12 fret joins - they all provide different playing palettes
Ive got 3 (and had 5) different sizes of acoustics, and they all play/sound/respond differently and one isnt worse or better than the other. ( as does the wood they're made from)
You "have" to try different models to find the one that suits, much as trying LPs Strats Teles "pointy things" with electrics - and it can take years - but thats all the fun
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
Because smaller guitars tend to have better, more balanced voicing. The dreadnought was introduced in the first place not for any tone quality reason but simply to be louder. (Back in the days before amplification, if you played in a band with trumpets and banjos you needed all the volume you could get!) Dreadnoughts, especially rosewood dreadnoughts, tend to be boomy. The traditional rounded guitar shape (as exemplified by classical guitars and reproduced in sizes large and small by everything from a parlour to a 000 to a jumbo) was made that way for a reason. So we are looking at the wrong question.
The right question is "If you don't need the volume of a dreadnought, why buy one at all?"
(Disclaimer: 2 of my 7 main guitars are in fact dreadnoughts. I bought them of my own free will because I liked them, and still do. One of my four best, most all-round playable guitars is a dreadnought - admittedly with a cedar top which makes it more balanced and less shouty than the average dred.)
If you get a resonator, get a light one.
I find it very rare that I find a small guitar that sounds as good as a jumbo. Many small guitars sound horribly boxy to me
I also agree on the woods: Cedar and redwood with rosewood or similar are the best combinations for me
I have an all-Koa jumbo too, that is a real contrast to other woods
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
(Disclaimer: I've never played one, but people I respect have said nice things about them.)
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.