Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
In a different word, no.
Coated strings sound different. Not "better" or "worse", just different. Let's take the extreme examples and compare a set of Elixir Nanoweb 12s with a set of standard uncoated Martin 12s, both in phosphor bronze. (Or any brand of uncoated round-wound string - there isn't all that much difference between standard sets from Martin, Rotosound, Fender, Ernie Ball, D'Addario, SIT, John Pearse, Galli, Darco, GHS, or any other maker. They are certainly not "all the same" but the differences tend to be subtle.)
The uncoated strings have more edge, more bark in the sound, where the Elixirs are smoother, and are far less prone to unwanted fretting-hand noise. Which sound you prefer depends on your taste, your guitar, and your technique. Some people only like Elixirs, some people can't stand them and only like uncoated strings. Other people again like both sounds and appreciate the difference as just one more thing you can do to make interesting sounds on your various guitars.
As I understand it, Elixir winds the string, then coats it. Every other maker that I know of coats the winding wire first, then winds the string. The results are quite different. Most coated strings (Rotosound, Martin, D'Addario, Ball, GHS, and so on), from a feel and sound point of view, are somewhere in between uncoated strings and Elixirs, but leaning towards the uncoated end of the spectrum. The result seems to be fairly consistent: they sound fairly similar to uncoated strings (but just a little smoother), they feel similar to uncoated strings (but noticeably more soapy), but unfortunately they tend to squeal under the left hand nearly as much as uncoated strings.
I don't care so much about the lifespan (considering the money I've thrown at guitars over the journey, anything I spend on strings is just spare change), the thing I like about coated strings is the lack of left-hand squeal. The thing I like about uncoated and most non -Elixir coated strings is the sound, and the slightly rough feel under my right hand fingertips which is, for me, a big part of getting my sound. For ages now I've been looking for a string which sounds and feels similar to uncoated but doesn't squeal. There is a thread here somewhere where I write the various candidates up every now and then as I try them out.
If your main interest is lifespan and you want an "uncoated sound" or something close to it, from the ones I've tried so far I'd recommend Santa Cruz Parabolic, Rotosound Nexus, and perhaps GHS Americana, but I have a half-dozen as-yet untried sets here. Who knows? Maybe one of those will be The Perfect String.
Id agree with Tanin's comments re fresh out the bag - but the for me the trade off for "longevity" is far grater than any "loss of zing" and I stick with Nano's
One naked string to avoid tho, Thomastik Spectrum Bronze - dull as bloody dishwater
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
How long the naked string remains at an acceptable level of brightness, is purely subjective and impacted by individual factors like acid sweat, smoker, kept in case, how often cleaned................... etc - as I said, as a once massive advoctate of always using nakeds - Im more than happy with nanoweb, and the longevity of tone it affords.
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
I do like my sound - all sound, including audio from TV/DVD/MP3 even neck pickups - or what ever, with less bass than most would use - Ive always preferred CDs to vinyl, my ears don't appreciate "warm" to me warm = muddy
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
The only other downside of coated is if you're a "heavy strummer" you do get spiders webs where the pick wears the coating
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
Because I find changes quote onerous I don't have a lot of inclination to experiment with many different types on my 12 string.
FYI- I use D'Addario EJ38's, on the basis that strings is that company's sole activity, so they must have to be good at it, don't know if that makes sense though.
the "condom" is in reference to the early POLYweb strings, which has a MUCH thicker coating, NANOwebs (other brands are available) are a HUGE improvement and arent that much "less zingy" than week old naked strings.
I didnt realise you were asking this for a 12 string, otherwise Id say - hey just get a pack and try em. at £15 or less its got to be worth a shot - Ive no idea what a 12 string pack would cost (dont really like 12 strings, so never owned one)
Or find a mate locally who uses coated - go have have a try/listen
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
So there you go: my 12-string string recommendation: Elixirs good, EJ38s better, normal 6-string set better again. Probably not much help to you. .
(Back in the day, when I used to play 12-string almost exclusively, I preferred silk and steels, La Bella was the only brand of them I ever saw, though that was before they invented the Interwebby thing and silk and steels were always hard to get.)
All strings dull eventually of course.
To that extent I wouldn't differentiate between coated and uncoated.
Treble strings and base strings often, for me, have different characteristics in a set of strings.
I suspect you are mainly discussing coated vs. uncoated, but a good example of lack of any correlation is that my favourite strings for my 2 acoustics for the last few years have been Monels (Martin MM12) - and they last for ages!
String tone is highly subjective and individual. I hope you find what you're looking for.