UNPLANNED DOWNTIME: 12th Oct 23:45
Acoustic Strings, round 2
What's Hot
This time for the Atkin 47.
Many may remember my lengthy thread on strings for my HD28 (
here) so I’m doing a separate one for this very different guitar rather than clutter that thread.
This guitar is Atkin’s Forty Seven, which is largely a Gibson LG-2 style, all mahogany back and sides, mahogany neck and pao ferro fretboard.
It came with Elixir phosphor bronze 12s, which sounded remarkably good. I initially switched to the same Martin Retros as my HD28 has had for a couple of years but they sound flat and dull on this guitar. I’ve already had some Daddario EJ11s on it this week because I already had them, but I don’t think 80/20s suit this guitar at all.
Next up I’m going back to Elixirs for a bit to really confirm that they were actually good, then I have a couple of other sets of phosphors en route, starting with D'addario XTs, which I’ve never used at all
0 LOL 0 Wow! 0 Wisdom · Share on Twitter
Comments
PS: good move switching back to Elixirs for a while. That gives you a known, familiar starting point to set against the others you try.
Monel is a type of tarnish-resistant steel and used to be used in the 'olden days' i.e. prior to PB in the 1970's. If you're listening to a recording of music played on an acoustic prior to that, there will be a very high chance that you are listening to Monel.
Last ages (hence cheaper+++). Less brassy sounding. Different 'steely' sound. Worth a try. Have been hooked on Martin MM12 for the last 2y. Tried PB on my Martin OM28 recently but swapped back to MM12 - even before PB's had died (which IMHO and with my playing frequency takes about 2w - I leave Monels on for 3-4m!).
Just saying.
I've put elixirs back on it for now and they're def better than the retro/monels or 80/20 EJ11s that lasted 2 days! I have some D'ad XTs to try next, and will line up regular phosphors from D'ad, Mangan, Martin and Newtone and see how I feel
Prior to the 1970s, most acoustics used brass strings (often wrongly called "80/20 bronze).
Not sure about the rest though. Is anyone? It would be interesting to find some actual source details as to the popularity or otherwise with players of Monel and when it was first used by guitar folk for strings.
Here's an interesting article from StringsDirect. But even it doesn't define sources of info.
What are Monel strings? | Strings Direct
I go back to the days before phosphor bronze myself. I can remember the chap in the guitar shop telling me about these great new strings made out of new stuff called "phosphor bronze".
Most acoustic strings were brass in those days. There were just a few odd-bod ones. There were silver-grey ones which I think were called "nickels" (presumably Monel or something very like it), and flatwounds (also silver in colour), and silk and steels. Oh, and electric strings, of course, but I never paid much attention to electric strings.
The fascinating thing c.f. now is the extent to which so much of all this was done on a trial and error basis in the past with little advice from shops, chatrooms, music store assistants etc. I'm sure when I was young I got most of my info from a friend who was a little further down his guitar journey than I was. That was about it!
The last decade or two has been tremendous for access not only to advice but a wider spectrum of kit and instruments. I never stop learning.
I've also used their skinny top/heavy bottom sets on my electric guitars for decades too.
I'm not an Ernie Ball endorsee, just a happy customer...
It was Gibson that first offered Monel wound strings in 1937 . D'Addario had already introduced 80/20 Bronze wound strings when John D'Angelico develop electric strings , nickel plated steel . and were manufactured by D'Addario.
It became a popular idea , nickel wound for electric and bronze for acoustic . Monel would of been more expensive, so out of the three I would guess less popular.
just because you do, doesn't mean you should.
tone wise it’s OK but I do find them uncomfortable to play compared to the Martin PBs I’ve been using. I’ll give it a couple of weeks/gigs and see how I feel then.
I’m still watching this thread with interest though as Elixir have become very pricey so a lower cost but good-sounding alternative could be worth a try.
I told my German friend in Cologne about them,he tried them on his Martin and he thought they were fantastic.
Ernie Ball Paradigm are not audibly different to slinkies (to my ears) but they don’t break…so far anyway…and seem to last longer.
Standard, core price acoustic strings are fine imo, as long as properly matched to the guitar. I’m currently using £7.99 Clapton signature Martins on my Martin 00028ec and they sound great. Don’t like Elixir at all.
I had EB Everlasts on my guitar at the same time and made the same observation.
I'll never put another set of EB strings on an acoustic guitar.
I keep coming back to Elixirs. String longevity is very high on my priorities list when selecting guitar strings. I also like the feel of Elixirs and appreciate the reduced string noise (especially on acoustic). I do perceive them to be a little "stiffer" than the equivalent gauge of EB strings. Monels felt more compliant, but they were so much quieter than 80/20s and squeaked like a MF. I've never had a set of D'addarios that I've considered to be any more than adequate. DR Veritas sounded nice, but died within 4 weeks (I can get 4 months from Elixirs before the tone starts to suffer, and 6 months before a string change becomes urgent). Dragon Skins were good, but only available in PB. The search for the perfect string continues.
Just put some D'addario XTs (PB 12s) on the Atkin 47. Initial impressions are very good. They feel less slippy than Elixir nanos, and the tone seems well balanced and a little less plinky than those elixirs. Will see how long they hold up but so far they seem well suited.