Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
If only I'd been able to get on with the wide neck and string spacing I would still have mine! The best-sounding small-body guitar I've ever played.
(Second hand at your budget, they're over £2K new unfortunately.)
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
My mahogany Songbird has wonderful sustain. Had a Dove on trial, but the rosewoods had already gone from the sale.
November or New Year are your best horizons now.
If you do ever go there, be sure to try the Atkin LG47. It's miles over your budget but it'll knock your socks off and instantly rematerialise them somewhere else, possibly Kansas. That good.
A 00018 or 00028 would probably be more versatile outside of straight blues fingerpicking though.
I also have a Martin vintage series 00-18 and the sigma sounds and plays better which is surprising to say the least.
Another guitar I was looking at was the headway h2-am. Great little acoustic, but expensive and quite hard to find.
Try the sigma you'll be surprised. Mine is the VSE version so I can plug it in, which I never do. I can honestly say this was one of the best purchases I've done this year. Extremely satisfying to play.
Here you have a used one for £275: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Acoustic-guitar-Sigma-000r28vs-very-good-condition/183343387359?hash=item2ab01e12df:g:s2gAAOSwg2FbWJgE
By the way this is what the sigma looks like:
Pros:
-Nice, comfortable small body shape.
-Big voice and volume for a small body.
-Very "Gibson" tone, like a more focussed version of my Hummingbird actually. Definitely in the same tonal ballpark.
-Lovely top (at this price range Martin seem to produce a lot of bear claw).
Cons:
-Poorly cut high E at saddle- noticeably off line/ wider string spacing B to high E than between other strings. This gave an artificially wide e-e spacing (2/32 larger than my hummingbird in fact). That would be ok if the strings were evenly spaced.
-Bass side tuning machines mounted off line, noticeably to the naked eye, the low e machine closer into the middle of the headstock.
A shame as it is otherwise a nice instrument. I think in the interests of variety I'll look at other brands as the tone wasn't a massive departure from my hummingbird.
Its also a lesson to try before you buy, although that wasn't possible in this case as its an end of line model and there were none within about 200miles of where I live. When I bought my hummingbird I went into the shop 3 days in a row to play it.
I've got their Stanford-branded "OM5-Vintage" model from a few years back and I prefer it the other OM-sized guitars I've owned, a Larrivee OM and a Brook. It's in the same ballpark as the few Martins I've played but a lot cheaper.
I've also heard that Stonebridge guitars are also Furch-made and have read some great reviews of those.
Anyway, here's mine. The 1 3/4" nut feels wider (not sure why - shallow neck? - no binding?). If anything it's a bit too wide for me. String spacing at the bridge is (I think) a bit over 2 3/16".
Slot-heads aren't for everyone but I love the look.
https://i.imgur.com/UzYtyIa.jpg
Might be the best guitar I've ever played, hence this NGD post is about a month out of date!