Query failed: connection to localhost:9312 failed (errno=111, msg=Connection refused).
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Subscribe to our Patreon, and get image uploads with no ads on the site!
Base theme by DesignModo & ported to Powered by Vanilla by Chris Ireland, modified by the "theFB" team.
Comments
Probably, but not that much. Are you going to use it amplified? That should work quite well even if the acoustic sound isn't great - I've done a couple of electro-acoustic steel-string conversions like that for players who wanted a giggable nylon-string sound.
Aside from cutting the nut grooves out a bit wider there aren't any real issues - just remember to pull the strings as tight as possible before tying them at the tuner posts, or you won't be able to wind on enough string to get up to pitch without wrapping it over itself, nylon takes a lot more stretching than steel.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
I don't need the Tak. I don't even know the nut width on it, classical guitars tend to have a wider neck I believe (never had one).
It will actually be easier to do with a Takamine than the ones I did, which had pin bridges - with those you either need to find ball-end nylon strings (they do exist) or tie a big knot in them - with the Takamine bridge you will be able to string it like a normal classical. The intonation may be a little out on the B and G strings (classicals are the other way round, the G needs to be longer than the B ) but you probably won't notice too much.
"Take these three items, some WD-40, a vise grip, and a roll of duct tape. Any man worth his salt can fix almost any problem with this stuff alone." - Walt Kowalski
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson